Sumio Iijima Ph.D.
| Position |
Department / Business Unit |
|
NEC Laboratory |
| Institution |
Disciplines |
| NEC |
|
| City |
State / Provence |
| Tsukuba |
|
| Country |
Website |
| Japan |
|
| Fax |
|
|
|
Sumio Iijima (飯島 澄男 Iijima Sumio, born May 2, 1939) is a Japanese physicist, best known for discovering carbon nanotubes in 1991.
In my youth
I am often asked what I was like when I was a child. Stated
very simply, I loved nature. When I was little, I took advantage
of every opportunity to come in contact with nature - I collected
plants and insects, I fished, and I kept a menagerie of small
animals, including pigeons, rabbits, snakes, frogs, and crabs.
I learned many things from my experiences with nature, and
I believe that this helped me to develop both sensitivity
and insight. In high school and university, I was in the mountaineering
club and the music club, and spent my youth exploring nature
and challenging the limits of my creativity.
|
 |
First meeting with the electron microscope, and acquisition of a specialty
Upon my graduation from the University of Electro-Communications,
Faculty of Communications, instead of going into engineering,
I changed directions into the field of science. Although I
managed to get into the Graduate School of Physics at Tohoku
University, I had come from a different field at a different
university and so my laboratory placement was decided immediately
after my interview. It just so happened that I was assigned
to the laboratory of Professor Tadatoshi Hibi, who was a pioneer
in electron microscope research.
It wasn't that I had a particularly strong desire to do research
with electron microscopes at the time, but I found that I
was perfectly suited to research in this field. After I finished
my Ph.D., I spent two years as a Research Associate in the
Research Institute for Scientific Measurements at Tohoku University
and 12 years as a Research Associate at Arizona State University
in the United States. During that time, I developed a new
electron microscope that was the first in the world to show
the structure of materials at the atomic level. This field
that I had dived into head first - the use of electron microscopes
to explore physical phenomena and structures of materials
at the nanometer level - came to be my specialty.
So it was that my meeting with the electron microscope determined
my path in research, but perhaps this meeting was in fact
more coincidence than "serendipity." Nevertheless,
it is true that the changes in that path, and the fact that
I dove into new fields, was a result of my determination to
find something, and I believe that there was something working
here other than mere coincidence. |
|
 |
In the United States
I spent the years from 1970 to 1982 at Arizona State University
in the United States. (In 1979, I stayed in England as a visiting
senior scientist at the University of Cambridge.) In a word,
one could say that these years represented my "apprenticeship."
The most important thing that I learned while in the U.S.
was "Don't do what others have done."
As a result of this approach, in 1971, I developed a high-resolution
electron microscope and became the first in the world to directly
observe metal atoms in the crystal lattice of titanium-niobium
oxide. In 1973, I used the same high-resolution electron microscopy
to record images of point defects in crystals through resolution
at the atomic level. In 1977, I succeeded in the imaging of
individual tungsten atoms, and was told that I had achieved
the dream held by researchers since the invention of the electron
microscope in 1932 - that of actually seeing a single atom. |
|
 |
Why I joined NEC after returning to Japan
I returned to Japan in 1982, and participated in the first
research project of the Research Development Corporation of
Japan (now JST), developing a new high-resolution electron
microscope. Then, in 1984, I discovered the phenomenon of
"Structural instability of ultrafine particles of metals,"
in which the atoms of metals move about like amoeba. For the
five years after my return to Japan, from 1982 to 1987, I
devoted my efforts mainly to research in ultrafine particles.
I entered NEC after this period, in 1987. About the time when
I was thinking that I wanted to develop a new high-resolution
electron microscope that could operate in an extremely high
vacuum, NEC expressed a similar interest in the development
of such an electron microscope. I thus began my first experience
as a company employee at the age of 48. Another reason that
I dove into fundamental research in a company was that electronics
laboratories have unique materials produced using expensive
equipment that cannot be made in universities, and I was sure
that these materials would become the basis for exceptional
research results using electron microscopes. The third reason
was that I wanted to test my own abilities - I thought to
myself, there is no reason why I can't conduct fundamental
research even in a company laboratory. This was because I
believe that when laboratories at universities and companies
compete in basic research and grow stronger through this friendly
rivalry, the result will be that fundamental research will
provide support for a wide range of researchers - the healthiest
pattern for the research field. Of course, all this has to
take place within the scope that the economic environment
will allow. I liked NEC's management policy, which was based
on the approach of "broad proliferation of science and
technologies, and the creation of new value," and of
"giving back to society."
It took about two years after I entered NEC, but I was finally
able to achieve my goal of undertaking world-leading development
of microscopes. Looking back on it now, the first paper I
wrote after joining NEC was about C60. I really feel that
there was a connection there. |
|
 |
The "Friday Evening Discourse">>
What is the Friday Evening Discourse?
Even
after discovering carbon nanotubes, my own lifestyle
and style of research didn't change in any particular
way. If I had to say something, I'd say it was that
I became so busy that I had very little time for myself.
I really believe (at least I'd like to believe) that
my directions in research and my curiosity about things
in general, are the same now as they ever were.
One exception, perhaps, is the presentation that I made
in May 1997 at the Friday Evening Discourse, which is
held by the Royal Institution in England. I have given
many presentations in the past, but this one in particular
remains with me as a very valuable experience that impressed
upon me the tradition of sciences in England.
The discourse has no prologue or introductions; it begins
promptly at 8:00 p.m. with the sound of a bell. The
bell rings once more an hour later, and the discourse
must then be ended just as promptly, even if the speaker
has not yet completed the presentation. This is the
traditional style of the Friday Evening Discourse. In
my case, I completed my presentation three seconds ahead
of time, and the bell rang just as I was taking a breath
after finishing. The timing was worthy of being written
up in the Guinness Book, and everyone in attendance
responded enthusiastically.
During my discourse, I made the following comment: "When
I am asked about the practical value of carbon nanotubes,
I respond with the same reply that the great English
scientist Michael Faraday gave to the Chancellor of
the Exchequer (the Minister of Finance at the time):
'One day, Sir, you may tax it.'" This comment also
won a rousing response. I used this metaphor to make
the point that carbon nanotubes offer so many merits
that one day there may be a tax levied on their use,
but I think perhaps the idea is even more appropriate
now than it ever was. |
|
|
 |
To the younger generation
I often use the word "Serendipity," because I believe
that in order for coincidences to happen, the process leading
up to it is very important. The ability to see things correctly
is nurtured through day-to-day observation. When I see so
many stories in the news recently about violent crimes, I
can't help but think that as children, these people were never
trained to think for themselves and to act correctly. "Excessive
service" is rampant in Japan today. For example, consider
the announcements you hear on the train platforms. This is
a very helpful announcement, which tells us, "For your
safety, please wait behind the white line." But really,
the passengers should be able to make this judgment for themselves.
If we are raised in a world where someone will always give
us the answer even if we don't think for ourselves, then we
will never learn the skills required to live independently.
If children in modern Japan were made to participate in a
"survival game," I doubt very much that even one
would remain standing at the end. This is the responsibility
of the adults in our society. I would like to see more people
coming in contact with nature, and living their lives thinking
for themselves, and acting accordingly.
I think that one of the reasons for the warnings we have heard
in past years that Japan is "losing its connections with
science" is a lack of sensitivity and observation skills,
which are learned through contact with nature. Research can
be undertaken in any kind of environment, as long as you have
the interest. I believe that true education means fostering
the ability to be interested in something. |
|
 |
To people wishing to become involved in the sciences
I mentioned earlier that the key lies in "not doing what
others have done," but "doing what others have not
done" demands a great deal of motivation. Where does
this motivation originate? This is a difficult question. Perhaps
it is the training to see things with a broad perspective,
and see through to the truth. We have a limited time to work
with, so we want to find a research theme that will have impact.
You may think it is difficult to continue fundamental research
in a company, which must emphasize profits. In practical terms,
the key lies in whether the researcher has the ability to
see what lies ahead, and whether that researcher's manager
is able to see the value in that future. Of course, if that
seed stays a seed, never bearing fruit, then one must have
the courage to quit as well. This can be extremely difficult,
however, if a large amount of money has already been invested
in that research.
I would like to ask the young people in Japan to strive for
research results that Japan can be proud of, regardless of
whether you are doing research in a company, a university,
or some other research environment. Without this pride, when
we take our place on the global stage, we cannot ever feel
totally relaxed. You must have the confidence to be able to
say, "I am creating Japanese culture." For example,
I believe that research and fabrication technologies using
electron microscopes - my own specialty - are something we
can be proud to offer to the world. I urge you to go out and
create sciences and technologies that you can be proud of
presenting on a global stage.
Career Highlights
Sumio Iijima (飯島 澄男 Iijima Sumio, born May 2, 1939) is a Japanese physicist, best known for discovering carbon nanotubes in 1991.
Born in Saitama Prefecture in 1939, Iijima graduated with a Bachelor of Engineering degree in 1963 from the University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo. He received a Master's degree in 1965 and completed his Ph.D. in solid-state physics in 1968, both at Tohoku University in Sendai.
Between 1970 and 1982 he performed research with crystalline materials and high-resolution electron microscopy at Arizona State University. He visited the University of Cambridge during 1979 to perform studies on carbon materials.
He worked for the Research Development Corporation of Japan from 1982 to 1987, studying ultra-fine particles, after which he joined NEC Corporation where he is still employed. He discovered carbon nanotubes in 1991 while working with NEC. He is also a professor at Meijo University since 1999. Furthermore, he is the director of the Research Center for Advanced Carbon Materials, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology.
Awards
He was awarded the Benjamin Franklin Medal in Physics in 2002,
"for the discovery and elucidation of the atomic structure and helical
character of multi-wall and single-wall carbon nanotubes, which have
had an enormous impact on the rapidly growing condensed matter and
materials science field of nanoscale science and electronics."
|
Related Content
A novel chip-scale instrument made from carbon nanotubes may simplify absolute measurements of laser power. Developers of the unit at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) say it may prove especially useful for measuring light signals transmitted by optical fibers in telecom networks.
After the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov "for groundbreaking experiments regarding the two-dimensional material graphene," even more research and development efforts have been focused on two-dimensional nanostructures. Illustrating the importance of this area in future applications, Two-Dimensional Nanostructures covers the fabrication methods and properties of these materials.
While the interdisciplinary field of materials science and engineering is relatively new, remarkable developments in materials have emerged for biological and medical applications, from biocompatible polymers in medical devices to the use of carbon nanotubes as drug delivery vehicles. Exploring these materials and applications, Materials in Biology and Medicine presents the background and real-world examples of advanced materials in biomedical engineering, biology, and medicine.
|